Geithner Penalty Waiver Act Introduced in House
Washington, DC,
December 2, 2009
Carter Bill would eliminate IRS penalties for foreign depositors
Taxpayers who applied for the U.S. Treasury Department’s amnesty plan for foreign income should pay the same penalty rate as that paid by the Treasury Secretary on his International Monetary Fund (IMF) back taxes, according to House Republican Conference Secretary John Carter. Carter and Congressman Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA) Tuesday night delivered speeches on the House Floor live on CSPAN in support of the Geithner Penalty Waiver Act. Carter says the nation must take that step if it is to uphold the Rule of Law and the Constitution. "People must have the assurance they will be treated like their neighbor when an issue of law arises. That is a necessary ingredient to have a civil society, and that is what we have been fighting for in Iraq and Afghanistan." The former Texas judge this week is introducing the Geithner Penalty Waiver Act to grant all taxpayers currently seeking penalty relief on foreign deposit back taxes the same zero percent penalty rate as Geithner was assessed for failure to report or pay taxes on IMF income. Carter says the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution mandates equal penalties for similar offenses, and that the failure of the IRS to assess any penalties against Geithner demands similar penalties for all taxpayers with substantially equivalent cases. "This bill seeks to codify what is now established by the law of precedent," says Carter. "The Geithner case has established a legal precedent for the determination of penalties by the IRS, and that precedent can be cited in all federal tax courts. The penalty is now set at zero." "Taxpayers who willfully attempt to evade paying their fair taxes should pay a penalty, or our tax code becomes unenforceable," says Carter. "This bill is not to reward tax evaders, but to defend the Rule of Law itself. If we as a nation choose not to enforce the law against the politically privileged, then we cannot enforce the law against others without undermining respect for the law itself." |